Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.4 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-03-11 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| -- | Just black and Sorta sage |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MP5 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 5 has a score of 89, which is better than Galaxy A35 5G's score of 79.4. The Google Pixel 5 is an a lot older phone than the Galaxy A35 5G, but Google was able to make it just a little thinner and incredibly lighter anyway. The Galaxy A35 5G features a little sharper screen than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a just a little worse pixel quantity per inch of screen, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2340 resolution, the Galaxy A35 5G also counts with a little bit bigger screen.
The Galaxy A35 5G and the Google Pixel 5 count with incredibly similar memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos, both of them have the same internal memory capacity. Google Pixel 5 counts with a much faster processing unit than Galaxy A35 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Google Pixel 5 also has a larger amount of RAM.
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G takes much better photos and videos than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for low-light captures and slower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G also counts with a lot larger sensor shooting lot higher quality videos and pictures and a much higher 50 MP resolution camera in the back.
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G counts with greater battery performance than Google Pixel 5, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.