Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.4 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Android 14 | Android 5.0 |
| 2024-03-11 | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| -- | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | S-LCD 3 |
| 390 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.3 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G68 MP5 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 27.80mm focal length |
| 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.44 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A35 5G has a score of 79.4, which is just a bit better than HTC One M9's 77.7 general score. Both of these phones include Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy A35 5G has a more recent 14 version and HTC One M9 has Android 5.0 version. The Galaxy A35 5G construction is noticeably newer and somewhat thinner, but a lot heavier than the HTC One M9.
HTC One M9 features an extremely better processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has lesser RAM, and they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the HTC One M9 also counts with a 64-bit processing unit and an additional graphics processor. HTC One M9 counts with a brighter screen than Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has a bit worse 1920 x 1080 pixels resolution and a lot smaller display, it also counts with a just a little higher pixels amount in each inch in the screen.
The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G shoots much clearer photographs and videos than HTC One M9, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G also has a larger sensor, a way better resolution back facing camera and a bigger aperture for better low light captures and video.
The Galaxy A35 5G features a superior storage capacity for applications and games than HTC One M9, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory. The Galaxy A35 5G counts with a really longer battery life than HTC One M9, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.