Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.4 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-03-11 | 2017-02-21 |
| 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| -- | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 390 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MP5 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.12 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A35 5G is a bit better than HTC U Ultra, getting a 79.4 score against 77. Galaxy A35 5G's design is much newer than HTC U Ultra's, but it's heavier and a little thicker. HTC U Ultra has a bit better display than Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a higher pixels amount in each inch of display.
The HTC U Ultra features a lot bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. HTC U Ultra counts with a much better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and less processing cores.
The Galaxy A35 5G has a way better battery performance than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity. The Galaxy A35 5G takes much clearer pictures and videos than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the same video frame rate and a F1.8 aperture, the Galaxy A35 5G also has a larger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a back camera with a much better 50 MP resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.