Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.4 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-03-11 | 2017-05-18 |
| 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches | 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue, Silver and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 275.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 390 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MP5 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A35 5G is slightly better than HTC U11, with a general score of 79.4 against 77.6. The Galaxy A35 5G design is a lot newer, but a little thicker and somewhat heavier than the HTC U11. The HTC U11 features a little more vivid display than Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560px resolution and a greater pixels number per inch in the screen.
HTC U11 counts with a very superior CPU than Galaxy A35 5G, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores. The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has a little bit more storage for games and applications than HTC U11, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage.
The Galaxy A35 5G counts with a much better battery life than HTC U11, because it has a 67% greater battery size. Galaxy A35 5G takes better videos and photos than HTC U11, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for capturing photos and videos in low light environments, and they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Galaxy A35 5G also counts with a way bigger camera sensor and a camera with a way better 50 mega pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.