Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.4 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 14 | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2024-03-11 | 2016-03-31 |
| 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches | 5.88 x 2.91 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 5.61 ounces |
| -- | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 499.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 390 pixels per inch | 554 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 8996 chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MP5 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 2800mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A35 5G has an overall score of 79.4, which is just a bit better than LG G5's 76.1 general score. Both phones in this comparison work with Android OS, but Galaxy A35 5G has 14 version and LG G5 has Android 8.0 Oreo version. The Galaxy A35 5G construction is newer, but a little thicker and noticeably heavier than the LG G5.
LG G5 counts with a much more powerful CPU than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and an inferior number of cores. The LG G5 counts with a little more vivid screen than Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a greater screen density and a higher 1440 x 2560px resolution.
LG G5 features a much greater storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Galaxy A35 5G counts with a way better battery performance than LG G5, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G features a better camera than LG G5, and although they both have the same aperture, the same video definition and the same video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G also has a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a way better 50 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.