Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.4 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 14 | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2024-03-11 | 2018-11-09 |
| 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| -- | Black and Gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 390 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MP5 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.12 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G is just a bit better than LG G7 Fit, getting a 79.4 score against 77. Both phones in this comparison review have Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has the previous 14 version while LG G7 Fit has Android 8.1 Oreo. The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G is a notably newer cellphone than LG G7 Fit, although it's noticeably heavier and a little bit thicker.
LG G7 Fit has a brighter display than Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixel density, a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120px and much more brightness. LG G7 Fit has a lot bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG G7 Fit counts with a way better performance than Galaxy A35 5G, although it has less processing cores and lesser RAM. The Galaxy A35 5G takes much better videos and photos than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Galaxy A35 5G also has a way bigger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a bigger aperture to capture better low-light photography and video and a much better 50 mega pixels resolution camera.
Galaxy A35 5G counts with a much longer battery performance than LG G7 Fit, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.