Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.4 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 14 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo |
| 2024-03-11 | 2018-06-01 |
| 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| -- | Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 170.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 390 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MP5 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG G7 ThinQ has a global score of 81, which is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G's 79.4 overall score. Despite of the fact that the LG G7 ThinQ is a lot older than the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, it's construction is extremely lighter and just a little thinner. These devices come with Android operating system, but LG G7 ThinQ has a more recent 9.0 Pie version and Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has Android 14.
LG G7 ThinQ features an extremely better processing unit than Galaxy A35 5G, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. LG G7 ThinQ features a sharper display than Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better display density, a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120px and way more brightness.
The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G takes better photographs and videos than LG G7 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not recommended for low light photography and video and lower video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G also counts with a much larger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a much higher 50 MP resolution camera in the back.
LG G7 ThinQ counts with a way bigger memory for applications and games than Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G features a really longer battery lifetime than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has a 67% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.