Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.4 | 84.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 14 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2024-03-11 | 2019-04-11 |
| 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches | 5.98 x 2.83 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| -- | Aurora black, Carmine red and Platinum gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 215.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MP5 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG G8 ThinQ has a general score of 84.3, which is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G's general score of 79.4. The LG G8 ThinQ is a notably older and a bit thicker cellphone than the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, but LG made it much lighter anyway. Both of these devices work with Android OS (Operating System), but the LG G8 ThinQ has a more recent 9.0 Pie version and Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has Android 14, so it gives a couple additional features and enhanced performance.
LG G8 ThinQ counts with a better looking display than Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher screen density, a little more brightness and a higher 1440 x 3120 resolution. LG G8 ThinQ features a very superior processing unit than Galaxy A35 5G. Both have a 6 GB RAM memory and 8 processing cores.
LG G8 ThinQ counts with a way bigger storage for games and applications than Galaxy A35 5G, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the LG G8 ThinQ also has an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. Galaxy A35 5G features a really longer battery lifetime than LG G8 ThinQ, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3500mAh.
The Galaxy A35 5G has a much better camera than LG G8 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture and lower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Galaxy A35 5G also counts with a way larger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a camera with way more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.