Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.4 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 14 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2024-03-11 | 2019-07-02 |
| 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches | 6.11 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 6.38 ounces |
| -- | Mirror black, Mirror teal and Mirror white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2248 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MP5 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3550mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG G8S ThinQ has a general score of 82.5, which is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G's 79.4 global score. The LG G8S ThinQ is an way older cellphone than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, but LG managed to make it just a little bit thinner and lighter anyway. Both phones in this comparison review use Android OS, but LG G8S ThinQ has a newer 9.0 Pie version while Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has Android 14 version.
LG G8S ThinQ counts with a very superior processing unit than Galaxy A35 5G. They have 8 CPU cores and a 6 GB RAM. The Galaxy A35 5G has a little bit better looking screen than LG G8S ThinQ, because although it has a just a little worse number of pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a bit bigger screen and a quite better 1080 x 2340 resolution.
LG G8S ThinQ counts with a way bigger storage for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the LG G8S ThinQ also has a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. Galaxy A35 5G takes much better pictures and videos than LG G8S ThinQ, because although it has lower video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and a same size aperture, the Galaxy A35 5G also counts with a back facing camera with a way higher resolution.
Galaxy A35 5G counts with a very superior battery duration than LG G8S ThinQ, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.