Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.4 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 14 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2024-03-11 | 2019-11-01 |
| 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches | 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| -- | Aurora black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 222.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MP5 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.44 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG G8X ThinQ is a little bit better than the Galaxy A35 5G, getting a score of 82.7 against 79.4. LG G8X ThinQ's design is a little bit lighter than Galaxy A35 5G, but it is a little bit thicker and was released 4 years before. Both of these devices work with Android OS (operating system), but LG G8X ThinQ has 10 version and Galaxy A35 5G has Android 14 version.
Galaxy A35 5G has a little more vivid display than LG G8X ThinQ, because although it has a little bit lower display pixels density, and they both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2340px, the Galaxy A35 5G also counts with a quite bigger screen. LG G8X ThinQ features a much faster CPU than Galaxy A35 5G. Both of them have 6 GB of RAM and 8 cores.
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G features a superior camera than LG G8X ThinQ, because although it has lower video frame rate, and they both have a F1.8 camera aperture and the same (4K) video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G also counts with a camera with a much higher resolution and a lot larger back camera sensor.
The LG G8X ThinQ has a lot bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy A35 5G, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the LG G8X ThinQ also has an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Galaxy A35 5G counts with improved battery life than LG G8X ThinQ, because it has a 25 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.