Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.4 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| 2024-03-11 | 2020-11-06 |
| 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 7.14 ounces |
| -- | Titan gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 390 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MP5 GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.44 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG K92 has an overall score of 85.4, which is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G's 79.4 general score. These devices come with Android OS, but LG K92 has the older 10 version while Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has Android 14 version. LG K92's construction is a little lighter than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, although it's just a little thicker and was released 3 years before.
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G features a little sharper display than LG K92, although it has a little bit inferior pixel number in each screen inch, a little bit smaller screen and a quite lower 1080 x 2340 resolution. The LG K92 features a much greater processing power than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G. Both of them have the same number of cores and the same RAM amount.
The LG K92 counts with much more memory to store more apps and games than Galaxy A35 5G, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the LG K92 also has an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Galaxy A35 5G features greater battery life than LG K92, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
LG K92 has a bit better camera than Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has a tinier sensor which offers a lower image and video quality, and they both have the same video resolution, a F1.8 aperture and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the LG K92 also counts with a back facing camera with a way better resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.