Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.4 | 78.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 14 | Android 5.1 |
| 2024-03-11 | 2015-10-01 |
| 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches | 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 285.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 390 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.3 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G68 MP5 GPU | Adreno 418 GPU |
| 6.12 | 8.28 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.44 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | SIM |
| 10.6 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A35 5G is a bit better than LG V10, with a 79.4 score against 78.6. Both of these phones come with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy A35 5G has a newer 14 version and LG V10 has Android 5.1 version, providing some nice extra features. The Galaxy A35 5G design is way newer and just a little bit thinner than LG V10's, although it's also a little heavier.
The LG V10 counts with a much better looking display than Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and a better screen pixel density. The LG V10 features a much powerful processor than Galaxy A35 5G, although it has a lower number of cores and a smaller amount of RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G captures slightly better pictures and videos than LG V10, because although it has worse video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G also counts with a much higher 50 megapixels resolution camera and a much bigger camera sensor taking lot better quality videos and photographs.
LG V10 has much more storage for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G features a really longer battery life than LG V10, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.