Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.4 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 14 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2024-03-11 | 2018-03-09 |
| 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| -- | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MP5 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG V30S ThinQ is a little bit better than Galaxy A35 5G, with a general score of 82.5 against 79.4. Both of these devices include Android OS (Operating System), but LG V30S ThinQ has the newer 8.0 Oreo version while Galaxy A35 5G has Android 14. Although LG V30S ThinQ is much older than the Galaxy A35 5G, it's body is noticeably lighter and a little thinner.
LG V30S ThinQ features an extremely better processor than Galaxy A35 5G. Both of them have the same RAM memory amount and a Octa-Core CPU. LG V30S ThinQ counts with a little bit better display than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixel quantity per screen inch and a higher 1440 x 2880px resolution.
The LG V30S ThinQ features a much greater memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy A35 5G, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory, the LG V30S ThinQ also has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy A35 5G counts with a superior camera than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not good for shooting pictures and videos in low light environments, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G also counts with a much bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a lot better 50 megapixels resolution camera.
The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G features a much better battery duration than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.