Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.4 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-03-11 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| -- | Black and Gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MP5 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ has a score of 81.3, which is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G's 79.4 global score. Even though the LG V35 ThinQ is notably older than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, it's design is noticeably lighter and just a little thinner. LG V35 ThinQ counts with a much faster CPU than Galaxy A35 5G. They have the same RAM amount and 8 cores.
The LG V35 ThinQ has a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2880px and a better pixels density. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a lot bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy A35 5G has a way better battery life than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 3300mAh. Galaxy A35 5G shoots better photographs and videos than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for low light photography and videos, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Galaxy A35 5G also counts with a back facing camera with a way better 50 MP resolution and a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.