Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.4 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| 2024-03-11 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| -- | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MP5 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG V40 ThinQ has an overall score of 81.2, which is a bit better than Galaxy A35 5G's 79.4 score. Both of these devices work with Android OS (Operating System), but LG V40 ThinQ has the older 10 version and Galaxy A35 5G has Android 14. The LG V40 ThinQ body is lighter and just a bit thinner than the Galaxy A35 5G, despite of the fact that it was released 6 years before.
LG V40 ThinQ counts with a bit better screen than Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixel quantity in each inch in the display and a higher 1440 x 3120 pixels resolution. LG V40 ThinQ features a much better hardware performance than Galaxy A35 5G. Both have a 6 GB RAM memory and a Octa-Core processor.
The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G shoots much clearer pictures and videos than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has slower video frame rate and a tinier aperture which is not nice for taking pictures and videos in low-light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G also counts with a back camera with lot more megapixels and a much larger sensor taking lot higher quality photographs.
LG V40 ThinQ counts with a much bigger storage for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. Galaxy A35 5G features a very superior battery performance than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.