Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.4 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-03-11 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| -- | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MP5 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Velvet is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, having a global score of 87.1 against 79.4. The LG Velvet is an notably older phone than the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, but LG could make it just a little bit thinner and somewhat lighter anyway. LG Velvet has a much better performance than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G. Both of them have the same number of cores and the same RAM amount.
The Galaxy A35 5G has a slightly better display than LG Velvet, although it has a bit lower display density, a little lower 1080 x 2340 resolution and a quite smaller display. LG Velvet has a camera that is very similar to Samsung Galaxy A35 5G's camera, and although the LG Velvet has a camera with less mega-pixels resolution, a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a smaller camera sensor shooting worse quality videos and pictures, they both have the same camera aperture.
LG Velvet counts with a very superior storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy A35 5G, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the LG Velvet also has an external memory slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. The Galaxy A35 5G counts with greater battery performance than LG Velvet, because it has a 16 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.