Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.4 | 91.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| 2024-03-11 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches | 6.67 x 2.93 x 0.43 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 9.17 ounces |
| -- | Aurora gray and Illusion Sky |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MP5 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 20.26 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.44 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Wing has a global score of 91.2, which is better than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G's 79.4 score. Despite being the best phone we compare here, LG Wing's construction is a lot older, incredibly thicker and somewhat heavier than the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G. Both phones in this comparison work with Android operating system, but the LG Wing has an older 10 version while Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has Android 14.
Galaxy A35 5G features a bit sharper display than LG Wing, although it has a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2340px, a little bit smaller display and a quite lower pixels count in each inch in the screen. The LG Wing counts with a way better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG Wing also has a greater amount of RAM.
LG Wing features a way bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A35 5G, because it has more internal memory and a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 1,95 TB. LG Wing takes a little bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy A35 5G, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same aperture, the LG Wing also has better video frame rate, a larger back-facing camera sensor capturing higher quality videos and photographs and a camera with a much higher 64 mega-pixels resolution.
Galaxy A35 5G features greater battery lifetime than LG Wing, because it has a 25% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.