Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.4 | 89.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| 2024-03-11 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches | 6.36 x 2.80 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| -- | Midnight magenta and Solar black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 544.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MP5 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 18.58 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola edge is much better than Galaxy A35 5G, with a overall score of 89.6 against 79.4. Both of these phones work with Android OS (operating system), but Motorola edge has 10 version and Galaxy A35 5G has Android 14. Despite of the fact the Motorola edge is older and somewhat thicker than the Galaxy A35 5G, it's design is still lighter.
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G features a bit more vivid screen than Motorola edge, because although it has a quite smaller screen, and they both have an equal 1080 x 2340px resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G also counts with a quite greater pixel density. Motorola edge features a much more powerful processor than Galaxy A35 5G. Both have 6 GB of RAM memory and 8 cpu cores.
Motorola edge shoots a little bit better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, and although they both have the same video frame rate, the same 3840x2160 video resolution and a same size aperture, the Motorola edge also has a lot more megapixels camera and a bigger back camera sensor taking higher quality videos and pictures.
Motorola edge counts with a lot bigger memory for games and applications than Galaxy A35 5G, because it has more internal storage and a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. The Galaxy A35 5G counts with just a little better battery lifetime than Motorola edge, because it has an 11% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.