Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.4 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 12 |
| 2024-03-11 | 2022-09-08 |
| 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| -- | Aurora White, Cosmic Grey, Neptune Blue and Solar Gold |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MP5 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 6.12 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 12.65 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4400mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G is slightly better than the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, having a overall score of 79.4 against 78.5. Both phones we are comparing here have Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has the newer 14 version and Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has Android 12 version. The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G body is newer than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion's, although it's just a bit thicker and somewhat heavier.
The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion counts with just a bit better looking display than Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a much brighter screen, a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a quite greater display pixel density. The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion features a bit faster processing unit than Galaxy A35 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion also has more RAM.
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has a better camera than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, and although they both have a F1.8 camera aperture and a 50 MP resolution camera in the back, the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion also has a way bigger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a lot better 7680x4320 video definition.
The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion features as much memory capacity for games and applications as the Galaxy A35 5G, they have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage. Galaxy A35 5G counts with a little better battery lifetime than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, because it has a 14% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.