Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.4 | 81.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| 2024-03-11 | 2020-12-07 |
| 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches | 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| -- | Frosted silver and Volcanic grey |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | LTPS |
| 390 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MP5 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto G 5G is a little bit better than Galaxy A35 5G, getting a general score of 81.5 against 79.4. Both devices we compare here work with Android OS, but Motorola Moto G 5G has an older 10 version while Galaxy A35 5G has Android 14. Although it's the best in this review, the Motorola Moto G 5G is a incredibly older, somewhat thicker and a bit heavier phone than the Galaxy A35 5G.
The Galaxy A35 5G counts with a bit sharper screen than Moto G 5G, although it has a bit worse 1080 x 2340px resolution, a little bit lower screen pixel density and a little bit smaller screen. The Motorola Moto G 5G counts with a much better performance than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
Motorola Moto G 5G features a very superior storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. Moto G 5G and Samsung Galaxy A35 5G have incredibly similar batteries performance.
Galaxy A35 5G features a bit better camera than Moto G 5G, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy A35 5G also counts with a back facing camera with more mega-pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.