Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.4 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-03-11 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches | 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| -- | Smoke black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 150.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 390 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MP5 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A35 5G has an overall score of 79.4, which is just a bit better than Motorola Moto G Power's 76.1 score. Galaxy A35 5G is a extremely newer and thinner phone than the Motorola Moto G Power, but it is just a little bit heavier. Both devices in our current comparison have Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy A35 5G has the newer 14 version and Motorola Moto G Power has Android 11.
Moto G Power counts with a very superior CPU than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, although it has less RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Galaxy A35 5G counts with just a bit better screen than Moto G Power, because although it has a just a little worse number of pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a bit bigger display.
The Motorola Moto G Power has a bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy A35 5G counts with a superior camera than Moto G Power, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for shooting images or video in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same video definition, the Galaxy A35 5G also counts with a much bigger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a way better resolution camera.
Galaxy A35 5G and Moto G Power feature incredibly similar batteries.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.