Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.4 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 11 |
| 2024-03-11 | 2021-11-18 |
| 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches | 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| -- | Glacier Green and Stellar Blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 390 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset |
| processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MP5 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.44 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Moto G200 5G is a bit better than Galaxy A35 5G, getting a general score of 86.2 against 79.4. These phones include Android OS, but Moto G200 5G has 11 version and Galaxy A35 5G has Android 14. Moto G200 5G is a noticeably older and just a bit thicker phone than the Galaxy A35 5G, but Motorola was able to make it a bit lighter anyway.
Moto G200 5G has a lot better processing power than Galaxy A35 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Moto G200 5G also has 2 GB more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has a bit sharper display than Moto G200 5G, although it has a just a bit inferior pixels number in each inch in the display, a bit worse 1080 x 2340 resolution and a quite smaller screen.
The Motorola Moto G200 5G features a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not good for shooting photos in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same video resolution, the Motorola Moto G200 5G also counts with a much better 108 MP resolution back camera.
Galaxy A35 5G and Moto G200 5G have very similar memory for games and applications, both of them have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity. Galaxy A35 5G and Moto G200 5G both feature incredibly similar batteries performance.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.