Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.4 | 77.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-03-11 | 2018-04-19 |
| 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 2.97 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| -- | Blue and Gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.9 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 390 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 SDM630 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MP5 GPU | Adreno 508 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has a global score of 79.4, which is a little bit better than Moto G6 Plus's global score of 77.5. Samsung Galaxy A35 5G's body is extremely newer, but incredibly heavier and a bit thicker than Moto G6 Plus. Moto G6 Plus counts with a way better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G. They have the same RAM amount and 8 cores.
Galaxy A35 5G counts with a slightly better looking screen than Moto G6 Plus, because although it has a quite lower display pixel density, it also counts with a bit bigger screen and a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels. Galaxy A35 5G counts with a bit bigger storage for games and applications than Motorola Moto G6 Plus, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage.
The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has a better camera than Moto G6 Plus, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for taking pictures or video in low light situations, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G also counts with a back camera with way more mega-pixels and a way larger sensor which offers a much higher image and video quality.
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has a way better battery performance than Motorola Moto G6 Plus, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.