Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.4 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 11 |
| 2024-03-11 | 2021-04-27 |
| 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches | 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 7.94 ounces |
| -- | Dynamic Grey and Frosted Champagne |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 390 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2230 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MP5 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (360 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Moto G60 has a score of 79.5, which is just a bit better than Galaxy A35 5G's general score of 79.4. Even though the Moto G60 is better than Galaxy A35 5G, we must tell that it's also extremely older, somewhat thicker and just a little bit heavier. Both phones in this comparison review have Android OS (operating system), but Moto G60 has an older 11 version and Galaxy A35 5G has Android 14.
Motorola Moto G60 counts with a very superior CPU than Galaxy A35 5G, although it has 2 GB less RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores. The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G features just a bit better looking display than Moto G60, although it has a little bit smaller screen, a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a just a bit lower display density.
Motorola Moto G60 has a much greater memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 1 TB. Moto G60 takes slightly better videos and photos than Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for capturing photos and videos in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Moto G60 also counts with a lot more MP back facing camera.
The Motorola Moto G60 counts with greater battery life than Galaxy A35 5G, because it has a 20% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.