Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.4 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2024-03-11 | 2019-02-07 |
| 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches | 6.18 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| -- | Blue and Red |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2270 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 390 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MP5 GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 6.12 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G is a bit better than the Motorola Moto G7 Plus, with a general score of 79.4 against 76.1. The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G design is incredibly newer and just a bit thinner, but also heavier than Motorola Moto G7 Plus. Both phones in our current comparison have Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has the newer 14 version and Motorola Moto G7 Plus has Android 10, giving you some nice extra features and optimized performance.
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G features a slightly better looking screen than Motorola Moto G7 Plus, because although it has a bit lower pixels density, it also counts with a little bit higher 1080 x 2340 resolution and a little larger screen. The Moto G7 Plus has a lot better hardware performance than Galaxy A35 5G, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores.
The Galaxy A35 5G has a superior camera than Motorola Moto G7 Plus, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for low-light captures and videos, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy A35 5G also counts with a camera in the back with lot more megapixels and a lot larger back camera sensor taking way higher quality videos and pictures.
The Moto G7 Plus has a bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that supports up to 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G features a really longer battery performance than Motorola Moto G7 Plus, because it has a 67 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.