Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.4 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2024-03-11 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| -- | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MP5 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has a global score of 79.4, which is slightly better than Moto Z Force's score of 75.8. Both of these phones include Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has the previous 14 version and Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat. The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G is a newer cellphone than Moto Z Force, but it is somewhat thicker and noticeably heavier.
Moto Z Force counts with a little bit better screen than Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixels density and a higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution. Motorola Moto Z Force has a much better performing CPU than Galaxy A35 5G, although it has an inferior number of cores and 2 GB lesser RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G takes much clearer photographs and videos than Moto Z Force, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, a F1.8 aperture and the same video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G also has a back camera with way more mega pixels. The Motorola Moto Z Force features a much better memory capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy A35 5G counts with a really longer battery duration than Motorola Moto Z Force, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.