Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.4 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-03-11 | 2017-08-10 |
| 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches | 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| -- | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MP5 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 2730mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A35 5G has a general score of 79.4, which is slightly better than the Moto Z2 Force Edition's 77.4 global score. Although the Galaxy A35 5G is much newer than Moto Z2 Force Edition, it is extremely heavier and much thicker. Moto Z2 Force Edition features a bit sharper display than Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better screen density and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution.
The Moto Z2 Force Edition has a much greater processing power than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, although it has 2 GB less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G counts with a much better camera than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G also has a back facing camera with a lot higher resolution, a bigger aperture and a much larger back-facing camera sensor which gives a way higher photo and video quality.
The Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition features a much greater storage to install applications and games than Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. Galaxy A35 5G has a much longer battery lifetime than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has an 83% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.