Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.4 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-03-11 | 2017-06-29 |
| 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches | 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| -- | Gold, Gray and Silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MP5 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has an overall score of 79.4, which is slightly better than the Motorola Moto Z2 Play's 77.4 global score. The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G is a a lot newer phone than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, although it's a lot thicker and a lot heavier. Motorola Moto Z2 Play has a much better performing processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, although it has 2 GB less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Galaxy A35 5G has a bit better looking display than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a little less pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a bigger display and a slightly better 1080 x 2340 resolution. The Motorola Moto Z2 Play has a lot bigger storage to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy A35 5G has a way better battery duration than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a 5000mAh battery size. Galaxy A35 5G captures way better photographs and videos than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not good for shooting photos and videos in low-light situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Galaxy A35 5G also counts with a lot higher resolution camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.