Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.4 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2024-03-11 | 2018-08-16 |
| 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| -- | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 297.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MP5 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A35 5G has an overall score of 79.4, which is slightly better than the Motorola Moto Z3's 77.6 overall score. Both of these phones work with Android OS, but the Galaxy A35 5G has older 14 version while Motorola Moto Z3 has Android 9.0 Pie version. Although the Galaxy A35 5G is way newer than the Motorola Moto Z3, it is somewhat thicker and noticeably heavier.
Galaxy A35 5G counts with just a bit better display than Motorola Moto Z3, because although it has a just a bit less pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a bit higher 1080 x 2340 resolution and a bit bigger screen. The Motorola Moto Z3 has a really superior processing power than Galaxy A35 5G, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores.
Moto Z3 features a much better storage capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy A35 5G counts with a much longer battery performance than Moto Z3, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Galaxy A35 5G counts with a better camera than Moto Z3, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Galaxy A35 5G also has a bigger camera aperture to take better low-light photos, a much more mega-pixels back camera and a much bigger camera sensor capturing way higher quality photos and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.