Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.4 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-03-11 | 2019-05-15 |
| 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| -- | Blue and Brown |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 390 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MP5 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One Vision is a bit better than Galaxy A35 5G, with a overall score of 80.7 against 79.4. The Motorola One Vision design is lighter than Galaxy A35 5G, but it is just a little thicker and was released 5 years before. Motorola One Vision counts with a much faster processor than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
The Galaxy A35 5G features a little bit better looking screen than Motorola One Vision, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a bit worse pixels density, it also counts with a bit larger display. The Motorola One Vision counts with a superior memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the Motorola One Vision also has an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
Motorola One Vision shoots a little bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has a tinier sensor which provides a lower photo and video quality, a less mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera and a worse video resolution, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture.
Galaxy A35 5G has a much longer battery performance than Motorola One Vision, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.