Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.4 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-03-11 | 2019-09-05 |
| 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| -- | Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 450.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MP5 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 12.42 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Zoom is just a bit better than Galaxy A35 5G, having a score of 80 against 79.4. Motorola One Zoom is a notably older and a little bit thicker phone than the Galaxy A35 5G, but Motorola managed to make it a bit lighter anyway. The Galaxy A35 5G features a little sharper screen than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has a little bit less pixels per inch in the screen, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2340px, the Galaxy A35 5G also counts with a bit larger screen.
Motorola One Zoom counts with a very superior storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy A35 5G, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Motorola One Zoom also has a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 128 GB. Motorola One Zoom features a much powerful processing unit than Galaxy A35 5G, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores.
Motorola One Zoom features just a bit better camera than Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has a worse 3840x2160 video quality, a back camera with less mega pixels and a tinier sensor giving a worse image quality, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low light images. Galaxy A35 5G has improved battery performance than Motorola One Zoom, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.