Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.4 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-03-11 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| -- | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MP5 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) is slightly better than the Galaxy A35 5G, having a score of 87 against 79.4. Motorola razr (2020) is an a lot older phone than the Galaxy A35 5G, but it is a little lighter and a little thinner anyway. These phones come with Android OS, but the Motorola razr (2020) has older 11 version and Galaxy A35 5G has Android 14.
Galaxy A35 5G features a slightly better looking screen than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a quite bigger display, a just a bit better pixels density and a little bit higher 1080 x 2340 resolution. The Motorola razr (2020) counts with a much better memory to install games and applications than Galaxy A35 5G, because it has 256 GB internal storage.
Motorola razr (2020) features a very superior processing power than Galaxy A35 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Motorola razr (2020) shoots clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has a back facing camera with a lower 48 MP resolution, a tinier back camera sensor which gives a worse photo and video quality and a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture.
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G features a way better battery performance than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 79 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.