Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.4 | 77.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Nokia |
| Android 14 | Android 11 |
| 2024-03-11 | 2021-11-09 |
| 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches | 6.75 x 3.14 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 7.65 ounces |
| -- | Midnight Blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 390 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MP5 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | -- |
| 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 11.44 | 8.36 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4470mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A35 5G is a bit better than Nokia X100, having a overall score of 79.4 against 77.3. These phones work with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy A35 5G has the newer 14 version and Nokia X100 has Android 11 version. Galaxy A35 5G's construction is a lot newer, just a little lighter and somewhat thinner than the Nokia X100.
Nokia X100 has a much powerful processing unit than Galaxy A35 5G. Both have the same RAM amount and a Octa-Core processing unit. The Galaxy A35 5G has a little bit better looking display than Nokia X100, although it has a little bit lower screen density, a little smaller screen and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels.
The Galaxy A35 5G shoots way better videos and photos than Nokia X100, because it has a higher resolution back facing camera. Nokia X100 counts with a much bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory, the Nokia X100 also has a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has a bit superior battery lifetime than Nokia X100, because it has a 12% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.