Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.4 | 80.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Nokia |
| Android 14 | Android 11 |
| 2024-03-11 | 2021-07-29 |
| 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches | 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| -- | Granite Gre and Ultra Blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 550.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | -- |
| 390 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MP5 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.44 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4630mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Nokia XR20 has a general score of 80.8, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy A35 5G's score of 79.4. Both phones in this comparison review work with Android OS (operating system), but the Nokia XR20 has 11 version and Galaxy A35 5G has Android 14. Despite being the best in this comparison review, the Nokia XR20 is a noticeably older, a lot heavier and a lot thicker phone than the Galaxy A35 5G.
Nokia XR20 has a much powerful processing unit than Galaxy A35 5G. They have a 6 GB RAM and 8 CPU cores. Nokia XR20 counts with a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, because it has a little bit more pixels per inch of display, a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 resolution, a little larger display and a bit more display brightness.
Nokia XR20 has a much greater storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Nokia XR20 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G features just a little better battery life than Nokia XR20, because it has an 8% more battery size.
The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G takes a bit better pictures and videos than Nokia XR20, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G also has a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, a more mega pixels back camera and a larger camera sensor providing a better image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.