Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.4 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-03-11 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MP5 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50 is slightly better than Galaxy A35 5G, with an 83.8 score against 79.4. Although the Galaxy A50 is older than the Galaxy A35 5G, it's design is way lighter and just a little bit thinner. Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with a really superior performance than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, although it has less RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores.
Galaxy A35 5G counts with just a bit better display than Galaxy A50, because although it has a quite worse pixels number in each inch of screen, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2340, the Galaxy A35 5G also counts with a little bit larger screen. Samsung Galaxy A35 5G captures much clearer videos and photos than Galaxy A50, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not nice for taking pictures and video in low-light environments, it also counts with a lot higher 3840x2160 video quality, a lot better 50 megapixels resolution camera and a lot bigger sensor shooting much higher quality videos and pictures.
The Galaxy A50 counts with a way bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory, the Galaxy A50 also has a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. The Galaxy A35 5G features superior battery performance than Galaxy A50, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.