Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.4 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-03-11 | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| -- | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MP5 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A51 is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, having an 85.5 score against 79.4. Galaxy A51 is an notably older cellphone than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, but Samsung could make it a bit thinner and somewhat lighter. Both of these phones use Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy A51 has the previous 11 version while Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has Android 14 version.
The Galaxy A51 has a lot better performance than Galaxy A35 5G, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Galaxy A35 5G counts with a bit sharper screen than Galaxy A51, because although it has a little worse 1080 x 2340 resolution and a bit inferior count of pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a bit bigger display.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 counts with a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, although it has a lower video resolution, a lower 48 MP resolution back-facing camera, a smaller back camera sensor and a tinier aperture which is not so good for low-light photos. The Galaxy A51 features a lot bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy A35 5G, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A51 also has an external SD slot that admits up to 512 GB.
The Galaxy A35 5G counts with better battery life than Samsung Galaxy A51, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.