Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.4 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-03-11 | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| -- | Prism cube black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MP5 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a score of 90.8, which is much better than the Galaxy A35 5G's 79.4 score. The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G construction is lighter than the Galaxy A35 5G, but it's just a little bit thicker and was released many years before. Both of these devices have Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has the previous 11 version while Galaxy A35 5G has Android 14.
The Galaxy A35 5G counts with a little bit better display than Galaxy A51 5G, because although it has a little bit lower 1080 x 2340 resolution and a little bit lower pixels quantity in each inch of screen, it also counts with a quite bigger screen. The Galaxy A51 5G counts with a much better memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy A35 5G, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the Galaxy A51 5G also has a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G counts with a much greater hardware performance than Galaxy A35 5G. Both have the same number of cores and 6 GB of RAM memory. The Galaxy A35 5G counts with just a bit longer battery performance than Galaxy A51 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 4500mAh.
The Galaxy A51 5G takes slightly better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for low-light photos, a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, a camera in the back with a lower resolution and a tinier back-facing camera sensor which provides a lower photo and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.