Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.4 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2024-03-11 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MP5 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has a general score of 79.4, which is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A70's 76.9 global score. Samsung Galaxy A35 5G's body is newer, but heavier and a little bit thicker than the Samsung Galaxy A70. Both of these phones use Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has a more recent 14 version while Samsung Galaxy A70 has Android 10 version, providing the user a lot of extra features and increased performance.
Galaxy A70 features an extremely better processor than Galaxy A35 5G. Both of them have the same number of cores and the same RAM amount. Galaxy A35 5G has a bit more vivid display than Galaxy A70, although it has a little bit smaller screen, a little worse 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution and a bit inferior count of pixels per display inch.
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G counts with a much better camera than Galaxy A70, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not nice for shooting images and/or video in low-light situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G also counts with a way larger sensor providing a lot better image quality.
Samsung Galaxy A70 counts with a much bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy A35 5G, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A70 also has an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has a little better battery life than Galaxy A70, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.