Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.4 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| 2024-03-11 | 2020-07-16 |
| 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| -- | Prism bricks black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 390 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MP5 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is much better than the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, getting a global score of 92.9 against 79.4. Both phones in our current comparison use Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has the older 10 version while Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has Android 14. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW design is somewhat lighter than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, but it is just a little bit thicker and was released many years before.
Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a much better performing processor than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has a little bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW, although it has a quite smaller screen, a little lower pixels density and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340.
Galaxy A71 5G UW features a much bigger memory for games and applications than Galaxy A35 5G, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. Galaxy A71 5G UW shoots a little bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy A35 5G, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the same video frame rate and a same size aperture, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a larger back-facing camera sensor providing a better image quality and a back facing camera with a much higher resolution.
The Galaxy A35 5G counts with just a little bit longer battery performance than Galaxy A71 5G UW, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.