Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.4 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11 |
| 2024-03-11 | 2021-02-22 |
| 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| -- | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 390 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MP5 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.44 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy F62 is better than the Galaxy A35 5G, having an 88.1 score against 79.4. Both of these devices use Android OS, but the Galaxy F62 has the older 11 version and Galaxy A35 5G has Android 14 version. Despite being the best in this review, we must note that it is also a notably older, a bit heavier and somewhat thicker phone.
Galaxy F62 features a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has a little darker screen, it also counts with a little better display pixels density, a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a little bit larger screen. The Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with a much greater memory for games and applications than Galaxy A35 5G, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also has a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB.
Galaxy F62 has a very superior processing power than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, although it has a lower number of cores , they both have the same RAM amount. The Galaxy F62 counts with a very superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, because it has a 40% larger battery capacity. The Galaxy F62 shoots clearer videos and photos than Galaxy A35 5G, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates, a same size camera aperture and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Galaxy F62 also has a larger sensor providing a higher image quality and a back camera with much more MP.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.