Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.4 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2024-03-11 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| -- | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MP5 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Fold is way better than Galaxy A35 5G, having a 97.6 score against 79.4. The Samsung Galaxy Fold design is somewhat thinner than Galaxy A35 5G, although it is incredibly heavier and was released 5 years before. These phones come with Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy Fold has a more recent 9.0 Pie version and Galaxy A35 5G has Android 14, providing a couple nice extra features.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold features a much better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy Fold also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has a slightly better looking display than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a bit lower 1080 x 2340 resolution and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better pixels number per inch in the display.
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G counts with a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for taking photographs in poorly lited environments and slower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G also counts with a way bigger sensor and a camera in the back with a lot better resolution.
Galaxy Fold has much more memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, because it has more internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G features just a bit better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.