Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.4 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2024-03-11 | 2019-02-05 |
| 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches | 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| -- | Charcoal black and Ocean blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 390 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MP5 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 6.12 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 12.00mm focal length |
| 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.44 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A35 5G is just a bit better than Galaxy M20, having a 79.4 score against 78.9. These phones use Android operating system, but the Galaxy A35 5G has 14 version while Galaxy M20 has Android 10. Galaxy A35 5G is a notably newer and just a little bit thinner cellphone than the Galaxy M20, but it's also somewhat heavier.
Galaxy M20 has a really superior processing power than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores. The Galaxy A35 5G has a little bit better display than Samsung Galaxy M20, because although it has a just a bit less pixels per inch of display, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, the Galaxy A35 5G also counts with a little bigger screen.
The Galaxy M20 counts with a bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has a much better camera than Galaxy M20, because it has a way bigger sensor providing a lot better image quality, a lot better 3840x2160 video definition, a bigger aperture to take better photos in low-light environments and a camera with much more mega pixels.
The Galaxy M20 has a battery duration that's just as good as the battery life in Galaxy A35 5G.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.