Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.4 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-03-11 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| -- | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 390 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MP5 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has a score of 90.8, which is much better than Galaxy A35 5G's overall score of 79.4. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 construction is just a bit lighter than Galaxy A35 5G, although it is a little thicker and was released 4 years before. Galaxy A35 5G has a little more vivid screen than Galaxy Note 20, although it has a little bit smaller display, a bit lower 1080 x 2340 resolution and a quite worse screen pixel density.
The Galaxy Note 20 counts with as much storage to store more apps and games as the Galaxy A35 5G, they have the same internal memory. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has a really superior processing power than Galaxy A35 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 also has a greater amount of RAM.
Galaxy A35 5G features a bit better camera than Galaxy Note 20, because although it has a tinier back camera sensor, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same aperture, the Galaxy A35 5G also counts with higher video frame rates and a back camera with way more mega pixels.
Galaxy A35 5G has superior battery life than Galaxy Note 20, because it has a 16 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.