Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.4 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2024-03-11 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| -- | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MP5 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is way better than Galaxy A35 5G, getting a global score of 98.9 against 79.4. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra body has the same thickness than the Galaxy A35 5G, but it's a little lighter. Both of these phones have Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has the older 13 version and Galaxy A35 5G has Android 14 version.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a much faster CPU than Galaxy A35 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy A35 5G, because it has a better 1440 x 3088px resolution, a little bit larger display and a higher count of pixels per inch of display.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a better camera than Galaxy A35 5G, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a lot bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a much higher video resolution and a way more MP back-facing camera. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features much more storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A35 5G, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1000 GB.
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G features just a little bit longer battery duration than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.