Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 79.4 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2024-03-11 | 2013-09-04 |
| 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| -- | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G68 MP5 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is a little bit better than Galaxy A35 5G, getting an 81.2 score against 79.4. Samsung Galaxy Note 3's design is lighter than the Galaxy A35 5G, but it's just a little thicker and was released many years before. Both phones in our current comparison have Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has the older 5.0 version and Galaxy A35 5G has Android 14 version.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 counts with a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy A35 5G, although it has a just a bit lower pixel density, a bit smaller display and a quite lower resolution of 1920 x 1080px. Samsung Galaxy A35 5G counts with a slightly bigger storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy Note 3, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 64 GB more internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy Note 3 counts with a much powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has less cores and a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with an additional graphics co-processor. The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G captures much better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G also has a much better resolution back camera, a larger aperture to capture better low light images and videos and a much larger back-facing camera sensor shooting lot higher quality videos and photographs.
Galaxy A35 5G counts with a much longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because it has a 56% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.