Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.4 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 5.1 |
| 2024-03-11 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| -- | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass; metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.3 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MP5 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 6.12 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A35 5G has a score of 79.4, which is slightly better than Galaxy Note 5's score of 79.3. Galaxy A35 5G is a newer phone than Galaxy Note 5, although it is heavier and just a little thicker. Both phones in this comparison work with Android OS, but Galaxy A35 5G has a newer 14 version and Galaxy Note 5 has Android 5.1 version, so it counts with a couple additional features and enhanced performance.
The Galaxy Note 5 counts with a lot better hardware performance than Galaxy A35 5G, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM and 7 lesser cores (although faster). Galaxy Note 5 has a sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution and a better pixel count in each display inch.
The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has a superior camera than Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G also has a much more megapixels back camera, a way larger back-facing camera sensor and a larger diafragm aperture for better low light photos and videos.
The Galaxy A35 5G features a much greater memory to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has more internal memory capacity. The Galaxy A35 5G features a really longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.