Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.4 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-03-11 | 2019-08-23 |
| 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| -- | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MP5 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note10 has a general score of 89, which is better than the Galaxy A35 5G's 79.4 score. The Galaxy Note10 construction is notably lighter and a bit thinner than Galaxy A35 5G, despite of the fact that it was released 5 years before. The Galaxy A35 5G counts with a bit sharper display than Galaxy Note10, because although it has a little bit worse pixel number per display inch, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a little bit larger screen.
The Galaxy Note10 features a very superior performance than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Note10 also has 2 GB more RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 features a very superior memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, because it has more internal storage.
The Galaxy A35 5G counts with a better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for low-light photos and video and slower video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Galaxy A35 5G also counts with a back-facing camera with a much better resolution and a way larger back camera sensor capturing much better quality videos and photos.
Galaxy A35 5G has a very superior battery duration than Galaxy Note10, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.