Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.4 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-03-11 | 2020-01-21 |
| 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| -- | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura red |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MP5 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note10 Lite is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, getting an 86.2 score against 79.4. Galaxy Note10 Lite's design is just a bit lighter than the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, although it's a little thicker and was released many years before. Both of these phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Note10 Lite has older 11 version while Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has Android 14 version.
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite has a way better processing power than Galaxy A35 5G. Both have the same RAM amount and a Octa-Core CPU. The Galaxy A35 5G features a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy Note10 Lite, although it has a quite smaller screen, a just a bit lower pixels density and a bit lower 1080 x 2340 resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G captures much better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not favorable for shooting images or videos in low-light environments and worse video frame rates, and they both have the same video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G also counts with a much larger sensor and a back camera with much more mega-pixels.
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite features a very superior storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite also has an external memory card slot that admits up to 1000 GB.
The Galaxy A35 5G features a little better battery life than Galaxy Note10 Lite, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.