Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.4 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-03-11 | 2015-08-21 |
| 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| -- | Black sapphire, Gold platinum, Silver titan and White pearl |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MP5 GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note5 is slightly better than the Galaxy A35 5G, getting an 80.2 score against 79.4. The Galaxy Note5 is an way older cellphone than Galaxy A35 5G, but Samsung was able to make it lighter and just a bit thinner. The Samsung Galaxy Note5 counts with a little sharper screen than Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a greater screen density and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution.
Samsung Galaxy Note5 features a much greater processing power than Galaxy A35 5G, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Samsung Galaxy A35 5G features a way bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note5, because it has 64 GB more internal memory.
Galaxy A35 5G has a superior battery duration than Galaxy Note5, because it has a 67% larger battery size. Samsung Galaxy A35 5G counts with a better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note5, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G also has a bigger camera aperture, a camera with lot more MP and a way larger sensor shooting lot better quality photographs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.