Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.4 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2024-03-11 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches | 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| -- | Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 281.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 551 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MP5 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10 is much better than the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, with a general score of 88.3 against 79.4. Samsung Galaxy S10 is an way older cellphone than the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, but Samsung was able to make it just a bit thinner and lighter. Both devices in this review have Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy S10 has the older 11 version and Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has Android 14.
The Galaxy S10 has a lot better performance than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S10 also has 2 GB more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy S10 features a slightly better display than Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 3040 pixels.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 features a much better storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A35 5G, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy S10 also has a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G counts with a way better battery life than Samsung Galaxy S10, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G counts with a superior camera than Galaxy S10, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for low-light images and videos and slower video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G also counts with a much larger sensor providing a much higher image quality and a much more MP camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.